medRxivJClub
Automated Versus Conventional Annular Suturing in Totally Endoscopic Aortic Valve and Ascending Aorta Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Trial
medRxiv · · Preprint · Open access
Hamiko, Rogaczewski + 10 more
Abstract ↗AI summary
The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Automated annular suturing during totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement with concomitant ascending aorta replacement shortened median procedure time to 120.8 minutes versus 144.0.
- Why it matters: Totally endoscopic AVR plus ascending aorta replacement is technically demanding, and annular suturing contributes to prolonged CPB and ischemic times.
- What they did: In a single-center randomized trial (n=86) from August 2023 to February 2026, patients were assigned 1:1 to automated annular suturing (RAM group, n=43) or conventional suturing (n=43), with technical success and procedural times as primary endpoints.
- The result: Automated suturing also reduced CPB (90.0 vs. 105.0 minutes) and cross-clamp time (62.0 vs. 74.0 minutes), shortened hospital stay (6.0 vs. 7.0 days), and showed no stroke, sternotomy conversion, paravalvular leakage, or 30-day mortality in either group.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.
- Open access