The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
NADH fluorescence lifetime imaging can reflect glycolysis–oxidative respiration balance, but its interpretation can fail when NADH-binding landscapes shift slowly over hours to days or rapidly via transient metabolite effects.
- Why it matters: The common assumption that NADH-binding properties stay stable during an experiment is not always valid, risking misinterpretation of metabolic state.
- What they did: This Perspective reviews two failure modes—enzyme identity/abundance changes during prolonged treatments or differentiation, and transient metabolite-driven changes in NADH engagement—then provides guidance for experimental design and interpretation.
- The result: By clarifying when each concern applies, the work helps researchers choose conditions and interpret NADH lifetime data more reliably across experimental timescales.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.