The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Youth-caregiver diagnostic discordance for multiple psychiatric diagnoses is examined longitudinally across developmental stages in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort.
- Why it matters: Diagnostic disagreement between youth and caregivers can complicate psychiatric assessment and tracking over development, but its longitudinal pattern across diagnoses is not well characterized.
- What they did: Using ABCD cohort data, the study evaluates diagnostic discordance for a range of diagnoses over time as participants move through developmental stages.
- The result: The longitudinal discordance profiles across developmental stages provide a basis for understanding how youth and caregiver reports may diverge during psychiatric diagnosis in this cohort.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.