The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Uncertainty-aware AI can flag unreliable outputs in clinical workflows, but uncertainty estimates alone do not establish safety without validation against relevant errors and linked actions.
- Why it matters: Conventional models may stay overconfident when wrong, and existing UQ guidance is often too mathematically dense to use operationally in medicine.
- What they did: This clinically oriented review synthesizes how uncertainty arises, summarizes four computational approaches, and surveys applications across clinical tasks, model development, foundation models, large language models, and agentic workflows.
- The result: It proposes an adaptable roadmap that connects local reliability testing and threshold selection with subgroup assessment, prospective clinical evaluation, ongoing monitoring, and governance.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.