Beyond precision to justice.

Equitable access to genomics remains profoundly unequal, and the next revolution depends on organizing science around those who need it most rather than sequencing advances alone.

• Why it matters: Unequal access limits whether genomics can improve health, creating a gap between technological progress and real-world benefit for people who need it.
• What they did: The argument calls for shifting priorities so that scientific and ethical planning explicitly centers underserved groups, treating equitable access as a core requirement.
• The result: Making equitable access a scientific and ethical imperative is positioned as necessary for genomics to improve health, implying progress requires organizational change beyond better sequencing.

AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.