The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Atomically dispersed Ru-O-Cr motifs damp Ru oxidation during acidic oxygen evolution, yielding a 55.7-fold higher resistance to oxidation-induced Ru dissolution than conventional SACs.
- Why it matters: Single-atom catalysts are prone to oxidative instability, and bulk-style doping poorly controls their electronic and structural dynamics under operating conditions.
- What they did: The team engineered proximal Ru-O-Cr motifs and used in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy to track Ru and Cr redox changes and local metal–oxygen coordination during acidic oxygen evolution.
- The result: In proton exchange membrane water electrolysis at 1 A cm -2, Ru-O-Cr catalysts show degradation rates 6.8-fold and 14.4-fold lower than Ru SACs and commercial RuO 2, respectively.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.