The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
A modified Delphi process in type 2 diabetes reached consensus on a core set of 35 disease-modification outcomes across 11 domains, using two rounds with 233 and 79 participants.
- Why it matters: The field lacks a standardized outcome set for disease modification, which hampers consistent trial design and makes it difficult to compare interventions aimed at changing long-term trajectory.
- What they did: The team identified candidate outcomes from the literature, then refined them with an international multidisciplinary steering group and conducted two Delphi rounds per COMET guidance.
- The result: The resulting framework supports selecting outcomes, improving consistency across trials, enabling intervention comparisons, and evaluating disease-modifying strategies in type 2 diabetes.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.