medRxivJClub
Does the method matter? Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency and ease of hearing-aid gain self-adjustment
medRxiv · · Preprint · Open access
Benecke, Whitmer
Abstract ↗AI summary
The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Adult hearing-aid users with mild to moderate symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss can self-adjust linear frequency-dependent gain with reasonable reliability (median σ = 2.8 dB).
- Why it matters: Conventional hearing-aid personalization is limited because clinicians and patients cannot easily align on what is heard, so self-adjustment needs to be effective, efficient, and easy.
- What they did: In two self-adjustment tasks (n = 41 from prescription; n = 32 from random starting points), participants used three interface bass/mid/treble configurations and three stimuli (music, speech, speech-in-noise) to set preferred gain and match sounds.
- The result: Interface complexity and centre frequency increased absolute sound-matching error, but interface and stimulus showed no substantial effects on self-adjustment reliability; matching accuracy and questionnaires did not predict gains or reliability.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.
- Open access
- 1 cites