The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
In 672 natural scenes, direct versus diffuse lighting combined with local 3D geometry systematically changed scene and target colors, patterns, and spatial-scale relationships, especially via shadows.
- Why it matters: Appearance statistics used to compare animals and backgrounds may be biased if lighting conditions and three-dimensional habitat structure interact, yet this joint effect is poorly characterized.
- What they did: Using color-calibrated photographs and 3D scans of 672 scenes, the study quantified background and standardized target appearance under diffuse and direct lighting, tracking luminance and blue-yellow versus green-red information across spatial scales.
- The result: Shadows under direct lighting increased luminance and blue-yellow contrast across spatial scales, most at larger scales in habitats with greater 3D variation, while green-red information stayed highly stable and pattern directionality shifted with cast and self-shadows.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.