medRxivJClub
SMALL AND SICK NEWBORN CARE: LEARNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION ACROSS AFRICA AND BEYOND: Supplement 2
medRxiv · · Preprint · Open access
Reynolds, Thomas + 30 more
Abstract ↗AI summary
The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
In 66 NEST360 Alliance hospitals (Jan 2021–Dec 2024), 51.3% of eligible preterm/LBW neonates received KMC, and adjusted predicted survival was higher with KMC in every severity group.
- Why it matters: KMC can reduce neonatal mortality, but in sub-Saharan African hospitals its uptake and care quality vary, leaving uncertainty about how provision relates to survival.
- What they did: Using routinely collected neonatal inpatient data, the study analyzed KMC coverage and a quality-of-care cascade from eligibility through documented, timely, and sustained KMC, then modeled survival to discharge with mixed-effects logistic regression.
- The result: Among KMC starters with documented start dates, 29.2% began on day 1, and quality losses occurred at each pathway step; receiving KMC was linked to improved survival, with the largest absolute benefit in the most critically ill (adjusted predicted survival 7% vs 80%).
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.
- Open access