bioRxivJClub
Plate design confounds donor variation and model evaluation in single-cell perturbation screens
bioRxiv · · Preprint · Open access
Ghajari, Thirunarayan + 1 more
Abstract ↗AI summary
The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
In a 90-cytokine single-cell immune-cell perturbation screen, well effects explain most replicate-control variation in abundant cell types, and identical control wells differ by hundreds of differentially expressed genes.
- Why it matters: Donor-to-donor differences and shared plate layouts can make technical artifacts appear biological, undermining how response models are benchmarked and interpreted.
- What they did: The study analyzed a 90-cytokine screen plus two compound screens across four cohorts and simulations, comparing replicate controls and evaluating models with design-aware estimators and perturbation-specific scoring.
- The result: Design-aware evaluation changes interpretation of four recent analyses, and a deep-learning model outperforms a baseline on perturbation-specific differences in two of three cell types, while predicting the component shared with inert wells less well.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result
AI summary of the abstract · may contain errors · not medical advice · read the paper.
- Open access