PLoS Comput BiolJClub
Ten simple rules for developing a reporting appraisal tool.
PLOS Computational Biology · · Journal Article
Morrison, Lagisz
Abstract ↗AI summary
The abstract is read at the publisher; the summary is JClub's.
Development of concise, repeatable reporting appraisal tools is essential for peer review and editorial assessment of research manuscripts.
- Why it matters: Incomplete reporting hampers transparency and reproducibility in research, and existing guidelines are not tailored for appraising reporting quality during peer review.
- What they did: Authors propose creating operationalised reporting appraisal tools and outline 10 simple rules to guide their development, focusing on assessing minimum essential reporting elements.
- The result: Implementing these tools can improve the consistency and efficiency of evaluating reporting quality, ultimately enhancing research transparency and integrity.
The findingWhy it mattersWhat they didThe result